Enforcement of judgments

  1. Obtaining information about the financial position of the debtor
  2. Control of the operational fulfillment of all enforcement actions
  3. Prohibition of the debtor’s departure abroad
  4. Control of the seizure of property and funds of the debtor
  5. The protection of the debtor’s misconduct collection companies
  6. Support for the sale of property at public auction, auctions
  7. Helping debtors in the closing of the enforcement proceedings in the shortest possible time
P  eople who have at least once in their lives been at court, know – is half the battle to get the court’s decision, and another thing to carry it out. We are convinced that the priority to address the issue of enforcement of the judgment is to check the financial status of the debtor, the collection of all possible evidence and clarify information about the debtor’s identity. We have experience of positive outcome in addressing of the issue of the limitation of the right to travel abroad. State executive service employees are not always fully devoting their time to carry out enforcement actions. We know how to effectively monitor the progress of the enforcement proceedings and cooperate for the fulfillment of the operational set of required actions in the interest of the creditor. It is important to complete control over the issue of enforcement of the debtor’s property at public auction, auctions. Since there are cases of undervaluation of the property of a few markdowns and sales at auction for the benefit of stakeholders involved in the debtor. I focus on what should be used in the interests of the debtor and the creditor of the software ETSAP (electronic trading system attached property). We have extensive experience of the arrest and of the description property of the debtor. On the other hand, there are times when an objective property of the debtor is not present. Under such conditions, it is advisable to quickly carry out a set of actions and complete the enforcement proceedings in connection with the inability to comply with the decision. As a consequence, remove all seizure and other restrictions on the debtor’s identity. The scope of this practice has undergone positive innovations, such as the creation of a single registry of debtors and the introduction of the institution of private executors. Entrepreneurs and lawyers are ambivalent to the introduction of private bailiffs, because on the one hand state executive service system could not cope with such a reform, on the other hand there are fears of rights violation and the legalization of raiding. The only thing we can underline, there is a clear guarantee for the future activities of private bailiffs – the duty of insurance of responsibility. For information on debtors, included in the Unified Register of debtors are public and posted on the official website of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine. Notaries and state registrar of real estate rights have to make checks on the register of debtors.